HRA under section 4b of HRA ACT is to protect the health,safety and welfare of all racing participants.
HRA under racing rule 286 in the best interests of racing, if the anonymous tip is proven to be false/ prejudicial ,is the compliant not subject to sanctions?
HRA expands the 400k Marcomm report to eliminate transparency,just like rule 273 last spring that eliminates any appeal of any racing infractions, in that stewards/judges live racing decisions are final.
It’s ironic that a week ago, the CEO was given a integrity concern, it’s been a week,no response yet,today’s literature says within 24 hours to complete investigation?
HRA under section 4b of HRA ACT is to protect the health,safety and welfare of all racing participants.
HRA under racing rule 286 in the best interests of racing, if the anonymous tip is proven to be false/ prejudicial ,is the compliant not subject to sanctions?
HRA expands the 400k Marcomm report to eliminate transparency,just like rule 273 last spring that eliminates any appeal of any racing infractions, in that stewards/judges live racing decisions are final.
It’s ironic that a week ago, the CEO was given a integrity concern, it’s been a week,no response yet,today’s literature says within 24 hours to complete investigation?